This map shows 405 reservoirs in 11 western states from November 2025 through September 2026. Each point is one reservoir. Ring size shows capacity. The inner fill shows the share stored that month.

The basemap is Esri’s Oceans basemap, captured once from the Western Water Dashboard’s ArcGIS map. The symbols use the dashboard’s capacity rings and storage colors.

September 2026 storage at 405 western reservoirs over the dashboard’s ArcGIS basemap. Rings show capacity. Fills show monthly mean storage. Combined storage for 388 reservoirs with complete records is 48.4%.
The September 2026 frame as a still. The panel on the right gives combined storage and the three largest storage swings. Open the still.

I calculated combined storage for the 388 reservoirs with data for every month. I divided their total monthly mean storage by their total capacity. Combined storage rose from 52% in November to 60% in May. It fell to 48% in September. These are monthly averages.

Lake Mead averaged about 24% full in September. Lake Powell averaged about 20%. I stopped at September because only 292 reservoirs had reported October values.

The dashboard is built on Esri’s ArcGIS Maps SDK for JavaScript. Its reservoir data comes from nine providers. The animation uses the October 31 data snapshot to preserve the historical records.

Where storage changed most

I measure each storage swing from its lowest monthly mean to its highest. This measures a volume range, not total water movement. The comparison covers November 2025 through September 2026. An acre-foot covers one acre with one foot of water.

Lake Koocanusa has the largest swing: 2.67 million acre-feet. Franklin D. Roosevelt Lake follows at 2.49 million. Lake Mead follows at 2.00 million. These are the largest ranges among the 388 complete records.

The map labels the six largest reservoirs by capacity and the eight largest storage swings. Those groups overlap, giving nine labels. The trend panel follows the three largest swings. Each reservoir trend uses the same 0–100% scale.

Eight largest storage swings, ranked by volume. Bars span the lowest and highest monthly means. Dots show September.

Volume stored, in millions of acre-feet

  1. Lake Koocanusa2.67M acre-feet
  2. Franklin D. Roosevelt Lake2.49M acre-feet
  3. Lake Mead2.00M acre-feet
  4. Lake Powell1.61M acre-feet
  5. Shasta Lake1.59M acre-feet
  6. Lake Oroville1.58M acre-feet
  7. Dworshak Reservoir1.30M acre-feet
  8. American Falls Reservoir1.28M acre-feet
View the storage swing values and months
Monthly mean volumes and ranges, in millions of acre-feet.
ReservoirLowestHighestRange
Lake Koocanusa2.48
Apr 2026
5.16
Aug 2026
2.67
Franklin D. Roosevelt Lake6.42
Apr 2026
8.91
Jul 2026
2.49
Lake Mead6.87
Sep 2026
8.87
Feb 2026
2.00
Lake Powell5.12
Sep 2026
6.73
Nov 2025
1.61
Shasta Lake2.53
Sep 2026
4.12
Apr 2026
1.59
Lake Oroville1.79
Nov 2025
3.36
May 2026
1.58
Dworshak Reservoir2.16
Nov 2025
3.47
Jun 2026
1.30
American Falls Reservoir0.07
Sep 2026
1.35
Apr 2026
1.28

Monthly storage in the fixed sample

Combined storage at 388 western reservoirs, November 2025 to September 2026Monthly mean storage as a share of combined capacity. It rose from 51.6% in November to a peak of 60.1% in May, then fell to 48.4% in September. 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% Nov 2025 Feb May Sep 2026 November 2025: 51.6% December 2025: 53.7% January 2026: 55.6% February 2026: 55.7% March 2026: 57.3% April 2026: 58.7% May 2026: 60.1% June 2026: 59.7% July 2026: 56.1% August 2026: 51.4% September 2026: 48.4% 51.6% 60.1% in May 48.4% in Sep
Combined storage for the same 388 reservoirs in every month. Hover over a point to see its value. The table below lists every month.
Monthly mean storage across the same 388 reservoirs, as a share of their combined capacity.
MonthCombined storage
November 202551.6%
December 202553.7%
January 202655.6%
February 202655.7%
March 202657.3%
April 202658.7%
May 202660.1%
June 202659.7%
July 202656.1%
August 202651.4%
September 202648.4%

How many reservoirs were nearly full

The combined figure hides how many reservoirs changed class. In May, 178 of the 388 reservoirs were at least 80% full. By September, 83 were. Over the same months, the number under 20% full rose from 26 to 92.

Together, the 388 reservoirs held 97.1 million acre-feet in May. They held 78.3 million acre-feet in September. That is a drop of 18.8 million acre-feet in four months.

Number of the 388 complete reservoirs in each fill class, by monthly mean storage.
Share storedMay 2026September 2026
80% or more17883
60–80%10263
40–60%5565
20–40%2785
Under 20%2692

How to read the symbols

  • Each ring is one reservoir. Ring radius grows with the square root of capacity, so ring area follows capacity. Small reservoirs keep a minimum size so they stay visible.
  • The fill rises from the bottom of the ring, like water in a gauge. Its height shows the share of capacity stored that month.
  • The fill color repeats that share in five classes: under 20%, 20–40%, 40–60%, 60–80%, and 80% or more. Very small rings use a solid fill in the class color.
  • Labels show the share stored for the displayed month. Each label keeps the same position for the whole animation.
  • The sidebar shows the combined trend at the top. Below it, three small charts follow the reservoirs with the largest storage swings.

Method

  • A fixed snapshot of the dashboard’s reservoir data, from October 31, 2026, supplies monthly mean storage for each reservoir.
  • The basemap is one capture of the dashboard’s ArcGIS map, with Esri’s Oceans basemap, its attribution, and its scale bar.
  • Each reservoir is projected to Web Mercator, the projection of the basemap, and placed on the capture.
  • Label placement tests candidate positions and avoids overlaps with other labels and rings.

Storage moves from one monthly mean to the next. The tables and labels show the observed monthly values, not the values between months.

Data notes

  • These are monthly means. A reservoir can be higher or lower than its monthly mean on single days.
  • In 92 reservoir-months, the monthly mean is above the listed capacity. Listed capacities can differ from current operating limits. The map shows these months as full.
  • Green Peter reports −1,020 acre-feet for November 2025. A negative volume is not physically possible, so the reading is a provider or conversion error. The map shows it as under 20%. Its effect on the combined figure is less than 0.001 percentage points.
  • Seventeen reservoirs do not have all 11 monthly values. They stay on the map for the months they report, but the combined figure leaves them out. The 388 complete reservoirs hold 98% of the 405 reservoirs’ total capacity.

Sources and map services

Reservoir readings from nine public providers, through the Western Water Dashboard. Read the source data.

Esri provides the Oceans basemap and the ArcGIS Maps SDK for JavaScript. The map retains the basemap’s provider attribution.

Open the reservoir map.

The figures use fixed data snapshots. Download the figure data.